
This article was first published in HR Future in January 2005
BREAKING NEWS
IS AN IMMIGRATION “AUDIT” IN THE WORKPLACE NECESSARY?
With the advent of the immigration act number 13 of 2003 it became a
criminal offence for an employer to employ a foreign national
without the requisite current, valid and appropriate work permit.
Section 49 (3) of the immigration act provides as follows:
Anyone who knowingly employs an illegal foreigner or a
foreigner in violation of this act shall be guilty of an offence and
liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment not exceeding one
year, provided that such person’s second conviction of such an
offence shall be punishable by imprisonment not exceeding two years
or to a fine, and the third or subsequent convictions of such
offences by imprisonment not exceeding three years without the
option of a fine.
In terms of the Immigration Act the onus shifts on to the employer
to prove that the foreign national in his /her employ is possessed
of an appropriate and current work permit.
A further aspect which must be dealt with relates to an issue not
directly flowing from the Immigration Act but rather from the Civic
Affairs legislation and the amount of false identity documents that
are in circulation or have been obtained fraudulently and what
should you as an employer, director or HR manager be doing about it.
An application for work permit is a complex and administratively
onerous process. This process requires a host of documentation and
most importantly requires lodgement in normal course of business
with the Department of Home Affairs regional or district office in
the geographical area of jurisdiction where the foreign national
will either work and will reside. In fact even if an application for
a work permit is lodged in another geographical area, in terms of
the regionalisation directives of the Department of Home Affairs,
the application must then be forwarded to the geographical area
where the applicant will work and live, for processing and
finalisation.
Based on this latter premise one of the first items to look for
would be a person working in a large centre whose work permit has
been stamped by a lesser district office remote from the area of
geographical jurisdiction where the foreign national will be working
and residing. This is not a hard and fast rule but would be an
indication that there is possibly something untoward about the
permit and that the authenticity of such permit should be looked
into.
A further hint would be to look at the actual permit very carefully.
The permit which has been granted at an Embassy, High Commission or
Consular Mission abroad and which has been endorsed at that Consular
Mission would be a beige rectangular permit bearing a Department of
Home Affairs crest and a printed certification duly endorsed by the
consular office and also bearing a bar-code. Very often a primitive
colour photocopy of the permit is placed in the individuals passport
thereby indicating almost certainly that it is a fraudulent permit.
If you are in doubt consult a specialist immigration attorney or
even the Department of Home Affairs to verify the permit.
A work permit granted at a regional or district office of the
Department of Home Affairs would always be a narrow pale green
bar-coded sticker placed in the passport. Items to look for would be
alterations on that permit, or issue by an office outside of the
jurisdiction geographically of where the foreign national will
reside or work .
Permanent residence permits are generally the most common permits to
be issued or copied fraudulently. A permanent residence permit is an
A4 sized certificate, which under the Aliens Control Act was a pale
green certificate and bearing a serial number and all the
particularity of the applicant together with any conditions which
may apply to the application. The Immigration Act number 13 of 2004
presented a new type of certificate into which several safety
features were brought about including a hologram at the centre base
of the certificate. However many employers never see this
certificate as the next step in permanent residency is for the
applicant to have their permanent residence permit the endorsed on
to their passport and the employer then only sees the endorsed
passport.
Under the Aliens Control Act this was done by way of a rubberstamp
at the office of issue which was then endorsed with the permit,
signed by the relevant official, dated and then rubberstamped with
the date stamp of that office. This was the easiest permit to forge
and it is my belief that they are more false permanent residence
permits of this nature floating around the country then any other
kind of false permit.
With the advent of the Immigration Act number 13 of 2004 a new type
sticker permit, rectangular in shape and beige in colour was
introduced. Unfortunately it does not have any safety features and
will probably lend itself to falsification.
The easy way to determine false permanent residence is generally
when the applicant has to take the next step after having his/her
permanent residence in endorsed on their passport as it is incumbent
on the applicant, once his/her permanent residence has been
endorsed, to present their residence permit together with the
passport, birth and marriage certificates to the nearest district or
regional office of the Department of Home Affairs and apply for a
South African green bar-coded identity document.
Once granted the identity document would look much the same as that
being issued to a South African citizen save for the fact that it
will reflect that person as an "non citizen" quite clearly. It will
also reflect a person as having been born outside of South Africa.
The last three digits of the identity number would also be
indicative of a non citizen and therefore that the person has
obtained their residence by way of an application for permanent
residence. If the foreign national exhibits and identity document
which indicates him/her as being a "South African citizen" then in
all probability something is amiss. If that identity document
reflects them as having been born in a South African town then this
would in all probability indicate again that something is again
amiss.
A further complication arises where an employee presents an identity
document and advises that they did not apply for permanent
residence, but are reflected on their identity document as being a
citizen. Whilst there is a way of acquiring citizenship without
permanent residence in the form of an application for Citizenship by
Descent as set out in the South African Citizenship Act, this would
have had to have been preceded by an application for determination
of status and the applicant having provided sufficient documentary
proof that his/her parent (s) were South African citizens at the
time of their birth. Such identity document, of the citizenship has
been determined, would indeed reflect the applicant as a citizen
notwithstanding the fact that the applicant was not born in South
Africa. This only confuses the issue and becomes just another reason
why an “audit” or verification of this nature should take place.
The simple way of dealing with the verification would be to ensure
that you do contact either the Department of Home Affairs or an
immigration law specialist attorney and request a verification
exercise, bearing in mind the onerous sanctions which can be imposed
on an employer employing a foreign national who is not possessed of
the requisite work permit or permanent residence permit.
A work permit is generally granted for periods of one, two or three
years and any permit the endorsed on a passport for a longer period
must therefore be queried.
Work permits are employer specific and an applicant may not change
employer without bringing the mystery application for change of
conditions of his/her status. The HR department of the employer
should certainly read the wording on the permit issued, very
carefully.
It is always important for the HR department to keep a copy of the
applicant passport and other relevant papers to his/her work permit
on the personnel file of such foreign national in order to satisfy
our immigration and labour laws.
Julian Pokroy is a senior practising Attorney, Member of the
Immigration Advisory Board to the Minister of Home Affairs, Chairman
of the Immigration Law Committee of the Northern Provinces, was
Ministerial appointee to head the Association of Immigration
Practitioners of South Africa and was recently appointed to head the
Immigration law specialist committee of the Law Society of South
Africa.
Visit www.immigration-sa.com
The information contained on this
Website is of a general nature
and should not be regarded as legal advice. Specific action should
not be taken on the basis of any of the material contained
on this Website without reference to this office
Copyright in the content of this web site vests in Julian Pokroy.
home ~ about us ~ immigration guide ~ news letters ~ subscribe ~ links ~ contact